Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bowin Koala
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Bowin Cars. seems the simplest solution, per Exit2DOS2000 DGG (talk) 01:05, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Bowin Koala (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Listing here because I'm not sure. An individual "class" of cars, built and used for a single race (which it was never finished). Can't find news, books, anything online but that's probably because we are talking about late 1960s Australia, so asking for greater community review. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:34, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Question: AFD is a big step for something you are not sure about isn't it? Wouldn't a better first step to be to ask the articles major contributors as to whether the car is notable? --Falcadore (talk) 06:54, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Answer I think it is perfectly appropriate. This is the place for a discussion. If there is any question as to whether or not an article should be deleted, this is the place as a prod would not invite discussion.Postcard Cathy (talk) 03:11, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment It seems to be real enough, there's a wiki [1]. But, I see absolutely no reliable sources on the web for anything about Bowin racing though. There may be a notability issue here, if no one found it fit to write about Bowin in anything other than a fan wiki, and the pages here on Wikipedia. If someone has some magazine or trade press reliable sources, they should come up with them, otherwise consider this a delete !vote for all the Bowin articles. Gigs (talk) 09:33, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:55, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge - without Cites to provide WP:N & WP:V it cant stand up as a Article by itself, but worthy of inclusion in Bowin Cars untill such time as a spinout is possible. Exit2DOS2000•T•C• 09:11, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.